Source code

Wow! the things our genes do to us.

I mean ADD is just one example. There are so many other things out there that can be linked to our genetic codes. Anger, illness, stupidity ;), even who you want to sleep with can be, potentially, tied to your genetic code.

My best friend insists that homosexuality is genetic (and its opposite, obviously). I can not say that I completely disagree with him, but I do couch my responses in a better understanding of genetics. After all, it is not really as simple as big B little b. If it were, then we could honestly say that we expected the majority of people to be bi-sexual.

Genetics is not a matter of black and white though. It is only about 10% black and white at the far ends of the spectrum. The other 80% is shades of grey. Or would it be "hazel".

Eye color is a great example. My father has brown, my mother ... blue. The most basic example of genetics - out of four kids there is one blue eyed and one brown eyed. The other two are, well ... in between - green(ish) and "hazel". So the shades of grey come in that area - green and "hazel". They are obviously different from each other, and yet they are apparently from the same source. Where does the distinction between them start?

There is another point to this example. The eyes of the two "black-and-white-end" children are not the same shades as our parents. The brown is a little lighter - the blue a little more grey. If genetics were as simple as BB vs bb, then all of the bb eyes and all of the BB eyes would be the same as those of their source; and all of the Bb eyes would match each other. We would have no eyes which could be described as violet, steel, yellow, or "hazel". There would be no room for eyes that have "stars" of a different color in the middle (I have seen many people with eyes like these).

So, how does this type of response effect my friend who insists that, if you are genetically gay, you have no choice at all and any pretense at trying anything other than an openly gay lifestyle will result in the breaking of your spirit and ultimate demise?

It doesn't.

He has taken himself to the fringes of zealotry. If any opinion on this one item conflict with his own views, he walks away and ignores them. He refuses to even acknowledge their existence.

Maybe someday he will come to understand that if sexuality is genetic, most of us will actually fall into the realm of "hazel". Maybe he will accept the fact that most of us really do not care who he sleeps with. And maybe, just maybe, he will understand that, for the majority of people, having an issue (thought, value, etc.) shoved down their collective throat is far more repugnant than the issue itself ever would have been if left alone in the open.

And so I go on, spouting off random bits of information as I try to solve the puzzle. (And probably offending my best friend if he reads this blog ........ sorry.)

Random - it is how life seems to move most of the time. It is also how my thoughts flow here. I am always finding the next tangent and following it to a different subject.

Todays subject - speaking of random - is ADD in adults. The last time I brought this subject up to a group, it was met with responses like "ADD? I just call it multi-tasking." and "...just another cop-out so that people can get out of actually working...". These were about average for the ensuing conversation. They are also about as accurate as other group labels. That is to say - not at all.
I have enough experience to know the way ADD effects people with it. What are the best ways I have heard it described.
- It is like those commercials for those hearing things, where the person can't seperate out the TV or conversation from the noise in the surrounding room; except all the noise is coming from the same place as the conversation... and it's all in my head! -
- Multi-tasking is watching things on several TVs at the same time, but you only have to watch what you think is important and you have control of the remotes. ADD is the same, except you don't know what's important and the remotes are in the next room... on auto-surf. -
- You know, some people have a one track mind. I have a twenty track mind, which would be good, except that nobody knows where the trains are going, when the tracks switch, or when they might just dead-end in a black hole. It's very confusing. -

Even with descriptions like this, it is hard to know what it is really like if you do not live with it. It is hard to get people to even talk about what it is like because adults with ADD typically do not want anyone to know because they are afraid. They do not want to be ridiculed, patronized, dismissed, or any other form of discrimination that may be heaped on them.
They do not want to be LABELED any more than any of us would want to be branded.

And so I go on, collecting random bits of information and trying to solve the puzzle.

Inside one head

Randomized - to exclusion. That is - in a sense - the way most of my life has gone. It never occurred to me that there was a name for it, let alone a treatment. I never wondered, as some others did, why I did so poorly in subjects like history, government, or other social studies when I enjoyed them so much and could usually come up with correct answers on the tests. It was never troubling that my involvement in a conversation always led off on a tangent - at least not to me. But, it was also never mentioned (within my hearing) that the way things ran through my head was not the same as most people.

I was never really ostracized. But, I never really fit in with the usual categories of people either. Typically, I would find other people like me - that is to say, misfits: the All-Star jock who aced all his classes and dreamed of being Spielberg or Lucas; the 17-year-old HS freshman stoner who could out talk the debate team (when he wasn't high); the fashion-plate princess who would not demean herself to discriminate against anyone's "lack"; or the suburbanite who knew everything about, and was able to do, everything domestic, but hated to actually do - or even talk about - any of them.

These were my friends. Not really the bulk of society. Not really the fringes. More like the "ether" that connected and buffered all the various sub-cultures of society - letting them interact or pass each other as needed. These were the people toward whom I gravitated. These were my people.

Myself?... I was - and am - less of a contradiction, and more of a randomization. I could play with the jocks, discuss with the brains, game with the geeks, move with the shakers, or fit myself in with almost any group I chose. I could be about average in any of them. A sort of jack-of-all-trades for social groups. But, I was never content in any of them. I was never satisfied to stop and do one thing - period. And that seemed to piss people off. ---Who are you?---What are you?--- Just fit in!--- Define yourself.

What about just being myself???

I do not like giving definitions to things. I am not happy with labeling things. Boxes are adaptable structures, not containers. Lines are meant to be erased, redrawn, and incorporated into something bigger. We are what we are...which is only what we want to be.

And yet... I find myself trying them on. Taking that caption for a spin around the block. "Hi, I am John Catholic" or is it "Joe Mormon"? I am a "nature-freak" and/or a "computer-geek". Am I a "multi-taking-go-getter" or is it just "ADD"? Tommorow, I will be something else... or maybe not. Whatever seems appropriate at the time. Until I find one or two that just fit. Those stay with me - whether I want them to or not.

So ... the labels I have accepted? Husband, father, smart, ADD patient, know-it-all (even though I do not), shoulder (for crying on), blunt. There are others that I am on the verge of accepting, but I do not want to mention them and predispose people to treat me a certain way before I actually deserve it.